Historia y conceptos actuales de la artroscopia de tobillo

Niek van-Dijk

< prev
Home
next >
1 of 6

Artículo / Monográfico: Tobillo

Historia y conceptos actuales de la artroscopia de tobillo

The History and Current Concepts of Ankle Arthroscopy

Niek van Dijk

Palabras clave:

Tobillo

Artroscopia

Pinzamiento

Cartílago

OCD

Tratamiento

Historia

Evolución

Estado actual de la técnica

Keywords:

Ankle

Arthroscopy

Impingement

Cartilage

OCD

Treatment

History

Evolution

Current state of the art

Información del artículo

Publicado en:

Revista Española de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular

Número:

Vol. 32. Fasc. 2. Núm. 84. Noviembre 2025

Número ISSN impreso:

2386-3129 (es)

Número ISSN online:

2443-9754 (es)

Cita bibliográfica

van Dijk N. Historia y conceptos actuales de la artroscopia de tobillo. doi:

Autores

Niek van Dijk

Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica. Universidad de Ámsterdam. Amsterdam University Medical Center, sede AMC. Países Bajos; Unidad de Tobillo.
Centro Médico de Excelencia de la FIFA Ripoll-DePrado Sport Clinic. Madrid. España; Unidad de Tobillo.
Centro Médico de Excelencia de la FIFA Clínica do Dragão. Porto. Portugal;
Departamento de Ortopedia. Casa di Cura San Rossore. Pisa. Italia
Colaboración para la Salud y la Seguridad en el Deporte de Ámsterdam (ACHSS)

Referencias bibliográficas

1

Nordentoft S. Ueber Endoskopie geschlossener Kavitäten mittels Trokarendoskops Zentralbl Chir. 1912;39:95-7.
2

Takagi K. The arthroscope. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1939;14:359-441.
3

Burman MS. Arthroscopy of direct visualization of joints. An experimental cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1931;13:669-95.
4

Watanabe M. Sefloc Arthrocope (Watanabe no. 24 arthroscope). Monograph. Tokyo: Teishin Hospital; 1972.
5

Chen DS, Wertheimer SJ. Centrally located osteochondral fracture of the talus. J Foot Surg. 1992;31:134-40.
6

Werner BC, Burrus MT, Park JS, et al. Trends in Ankle Arthroscopy and Its Use in the Management of Pathologic Conditions of the Lateral Ankle in the United States: A National Database Study. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(7):1330-7.
7

Medtech 360. Markets for Arthroscopy Devices. Disponible en: http://mrg.net/Products-and-Services/Syndicated.
8

Guhl J. Ankle arthroscopy Schlack Inc.; 1992.
9

Van Dijk CN, Scholte D. Arthroscopy of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(1):90-6.
10

Van Dijk CN. Ankle Arthroscopy: Techniques Developed by the Amsterdam Foot and Ankle School. Springer; 2014.
11

Lubowitz JH, Brand JC, Rossi MJ. Letters to the Editor Highlight Current Controversies. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):297-9.
12

Ferkel RD. Editorial commentary: Ankle arthroscopy: Correct portals and distraction are the keys to success. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:1375-6.
13

Vega J, Dalmau-Pastor M. Ankle arthroscopy: No-distraction and dorsiflexion technique is the key for ankle arthroscopy evolution. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1380-2.
14

Ferkel RD. Author reply to “‘Ankle arthroscopy: No-distraction and dorsiflexion technique is the key for ankle arthroscopy evolution”. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1382-3.
15

Ferkel RD. Editorial commentary: Osteochondral lesions of the talus—Are we going the wrong way? Arthroscopy. 2017;33:2246-7.
16

Dalmau-Pastor M, Vega J. Ankle Arthroscopy: No-Distraction and Dorsiflexion Allows Advanced Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(12):3171-2.
17

Connelly J, Ferkel RD. Ankle Arthroscopy: Correct Portals and Noninvasive Distraction. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(4):1066-7.
18

Ferkel RD. Foot and Ankle Arthroscopy. Second Edition. Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
19

Van Dijk CN, van Bergen CJA. Advancements in ankle arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(11):635-46.
20

Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(8):871-6.
21

De Leeuw PA, Golanó P, Clavero JA, van Dijk CN. Anterior ankle arthroscopy, distraction or dorsiflexion? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):594-600.
22

Tonogai I, Hayashi F, Tsuruo Y, Sairyo K. Distance Between the Anterior Distal Tibial Edge and the Anterior Tibial Artery in Distraction and Nondistraction During Anterior Ankle Arthroscopy: A Cadaveric Study. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(1):113-8.
23

Van Dijk CN, Verhagen RA, Tol HJ. Technical note: Resterilizable noninvasive ankle distraction device. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(3):E12.
24

Hirtler L, Schuh R. Accessibility of the Talar Dome-Anatomic Comparison of Plantarflexion Versus Noninvasive Distraction in Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(2):573-80.
25

Zengerink M, van Dijk CN. Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(8):1420-31.
26

Ferkel RD, Heath DD, Guhl JF. Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1996;12:200-8.
27

Galla M, Lobenhoffer P. Technique and results of arthroscopic treatment of posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;17:79-84.
28

Ferkel RD. Ankle and Foot Arthroscopy, Contemporary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Smith & Nephew Inc.; 2009. Disponible en: http://www.ankle-arthroscopy.co.uk.
29

Shah R, Bandikalla VS. Role of Arthroscopy in Various Ankle Disorders. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(2):333-41.
30

Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, et al. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):345-51.
31

Howard S, Hoang V, Sagers K, et al. Identifying Intra-Articular Pathology With Arthroscopy Prior to Open Ankle Fracture Fixation. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021;3(1):e177-e181.
32

Yasui Y, Shimozono Y, Hung CW, et al. Postoperative Reoperations and Complications in 32,307 Ankle Fractures With and Without Concurrent Ankle Arthroscopic Procedures in a 5-Year Period Based on a Large U.S. Healthcare Database. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(1):6-9.
33

Darwich A, Adam J, Dally FJ, et al. Incidence of concomitant chondral/osteochondral lesions in acute ankle fractures and their effect on clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(1):63-74.
34

Hintermann B, Boss A, Schäfer D. Arthroscopic Findings in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):402-9.
35

Okuda R, Kinoshita M, Morikawa J, et al. Arthroscopic Findings in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Do Focal Chondral Lesions Influence the Results of Ligament Reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):35-42.
36

Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Wollstein A, Kennedy JG. Reoperation rates following ankle ligament procedures performed with and without concomitant arthroscopic procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(6):1908-15.
37

Lee KB, Bai LB, Yoon TR, et al. Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37 Suppl 1:63S-70S.
38

Yang HY, Lee KB. Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Second-Look Arthroscopic and Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Cartilage Repair Tissue Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg. 2019;102(1):10-20.
39

Eriksson E. Arthroscopic surgery and local anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(4):205.
40

Stornebrink T, Stufkens SAS, Mercer NP, et al. Can bedside needle arthroscopy of the ankle be an accurate option for intra-articular delivery of injectable agents? World J Orthop. 2022;13(1):78-86.
41

Van Egmond PW, Meester RJ, van Dijk CN. From big hands to green fingers: it is time for a change. J ISAKOS. 2023;8(4):213-5.
42

Talbot CE, Knapik DM, Miskovsky SN. Prevalence and location of bone spurs in anterior ankle impingement: A cadaveric investigation. Clin Anat. 2018;31(8):1144-50.
43

Wang DY, Jiao C, Ao YF, et al. Risk Factors for Osteochondral Lesions and Osteophytes in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Case Series of 1169 Patients. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(5):2325967120922821.
44

Van Dijk CN, Tol JL, Verheyen CC. A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(6):737-45.
45

Walsh SJ, Twaddle BC, Rosenfeldt MP, Boyle MJ. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior ankle impingement: a prospective study of 46 patients with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2722-6.
46

Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, et al. No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(7):2142-57.
47

Anwander H, Vetter P, Kurze C, et al. Evidence for operative treatment of talar osteochondral lesions: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(7):460-9.
48

Guelfi M, DiGiovanni CW, Calder J, et al. Large variation in management of talar osteochondral lesions among foot and ankle surgeons: results from an international survey. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(5):1593-603.
49

Van Bergen CJ, Kox LS, Maas M, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(6):519-25.
50

Corr D, Raikin J, O'Neil J, Raikin S. Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(7):833-40.
51

Park JH, Park KH, Cho JY, et al. Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Are Clinical Outcomes Maintained 10 Years Later? Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(5):1220-6.
52

Rikken QGH, Dahmen J, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes after bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3525-33.
53

Gianakos AL, Ivander A, DiGiovanni CW, Kennedy JG. Outcomes After Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Impingement in the Ankle Joint in the General and Athletic Populations: Does Sex Play a Role? Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(10):2834-42.
54

Zhi X, Lv Z, Zhang C, et al. Does arthroscopic repair show superiority over open repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):355.
55

Brown AJ, Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Kennedy JG. Arthroscopic versus open repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(5):1611-8.
56

Moorthy V, Sayampanathan AA, Yeo NEM, Tay KS. Clinical Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Broström Procedure for Lateral Ankle Instability: A Meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60(3):577-84.
57

Lubberts B, Guss D, Vopat BG, et al. The effect of ankle distraction on arthroscopic evaluation of syndesmotic instability: A cadaveric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017;50:16-20.

Descargar artículo:

reaca.32284.fs2509021-historia-conceptos-actuales-artroscopia-tobillo.pdf

Licencia:

Este contenido es de acceso abierto (Open-Access) y se ha distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional) que permite usar, distribuir y reproducir en cualquier medio siempre que se citen a los autores y no se utilice para fines comerciales ni para hacer obras derivadas.